skip to content
Seal of U.S. Department of Labor
U.S. Department of Labor
Employment & Training Administration

Photos representing the workforce - Digital ImageryŠ copyright 2001 PhotoDisc, Inc.

www.doleta.gov Search:
Advanced Search
About ETA Find Job and Career Info Business and Industry Workforce Professionals Grants and Contracts ETA Library Foreign Labor Certification Performance and Results Regions and States
Home >  UI > Benefit Accuracy Measurement Program
Sitemap  Printer Friendly Version  

Calendar Year 1996
UI PERFORMS Benefit Accuracy Measurement Program Calendar Year 1996 Data

Calendar year (CY) 1996 data for the Unemployment Insurance (UI) Benefit Accuracy Measurement (BAM) program is summarized in the following table. The BAM program is one component of UI PERFORMS, the U. S. Department of Labor's closed-loop system for promoting continuous improvement in UI performance.

UI BAM rates are estimates based on randomly selected samples of UI payments. Overpayment and underpayment rates do not represent the actual percentages of errors detected in the population. These estimated rates are subject to sampling and nonsampling errors. The 95 percent confidence intervals are shown for each State's overpayment and underpayment rates. The interval equals the estimated error rate plus and minus the value indicated in the column (+/!-). The true error rate is expected to lie within this interval for 95 percent of the samples of the size selected by the State.

The 39,057 UI payments for which data were collected represents a completion rate of 99.9 percent of the cases sampled in CY 1996. Nonresponse bias is, therefore, not a significant issue. However, other sources of nonsampling error, such as differences among investigators in the interpretation of State unemployment compensation laws and administrative procedures, can effect accuracy rate estimates.

Users of this data are strongly advised that State UI benefit accuracy rates cannot be compared, due to differences in State laws and policies. No performance standards for UI benefit accuracy have been established. Overpayments and underpayments of UI benefits can be attributed to several causes, many of which cannot be directly controlled by the State Employment Security Agencies.

A more detailed analysis of this data is available in the UI PERFORMS Benefit Accuracy Measurement CY 1996 Annual Report, which is available by request from the U. S. Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Service, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW, Room S-4522, Washington, DC 20210 (Attn.: Division of Performance Review).


UI Benefit Accuracy Measurement
CY 1996 Annual Report
ST Sample Amount
Paid*
OP
RATE
+/- Amount OP* UP
RATE
+/- Amount UP*
AK 595 $95.23 6.61% 1.87 $6.30 1.18% .51 $1.13
AL 840 $201.35 10.01% 2.02 $20.15 .21% .15 $.42
AR 420 $182.29 14.59% 3.98 $26.60 .80% .59 $1.46
AZ 661 $152.38 14.70% 2.72 $22.41 .19% .13 $.28
CA 1,784 $2,874.40 6.51% 1.16 $187.21 .78% .29 $22.30
CO 722 $177.15 9.84% 2.25 $17.42 .63% .37 $1.11
CT 838 $420.57 1.94% .77 $8.16 1.02% .37 $4.29
DC 480 $77.45 9.14% 2.51 $7.08 1.56% .76 $1.20
DE 480 $88.26 9.10% 2.51 $8.03 .88% .44 $.78
FL 960 $647.79 6.48% 1.52 $42.00 .97% .29 $6.31
GA 960 $280.96 4.23% 1.36 $11.89 .30% .13 $.85
HI 481 $176.61 3.30% 1.51 $5.83 .46% .28 $.82
IA 547 $182.87 7.57% 2.05 $13.84 1.21% .37 $2.21
ID 602 $96.81 11.80% 2.63 $11.43 .96% .60 $.93
IN 1,024 $1,249.81 8.55% 1.77 $106.81 .30% .14 $3.75
KS 723 $133.85 6.38% 1.73 $8.54 .29% .28 $.39
KY 847 $222.94 3.67% 1.18 $8.18 .76% .29 $1.69
LA 604 $139.39 12.40% 2.66 $17.29 .91% .46 $1.27
MA 982 $743.96 3.58% .99 $26.64 1.63% .40 $12.12
MD 840 $337.22 20.13% 2.86 $67.88 .64% .36 $2.16
ME 600 $103.37 14.20% 3.00 $14.68 .29% .14 $.30
MI 1,170 $976.23 15.16% 2.14 $148.03 1.71% .33 $16.67
MN 960 $357.65 13.30% 2.19 $47.58 .46% .25 $1.66
MO 960 $254.36 5.37% 1.35 $13.66 .57% .31 $1.45
MS 720 $128.75 10.59% 2.30 $13.64 .43% .20 $.56
MT 441 $60.41 13.65% 3.26 $8.25 .85% .36 $.51
NC 941 $390.09 11.88% 2.21 $46.36 .46% .28 $1.80
ND 437 $29.13 1.91% 1.55 $.56 .19% .17 $.05
NE 606 $46.15 7.48% 2.17 $3.45 .60% .46 $.28
NH 418 $33.03 5.79% 2.13 $1.91 .78% .41 $.26
NJ 1,188 $1,141.97 6.75% 1.28 $77.05 1.92% .49 $21.96
NM 447 $72.90 5.60% 2.15 $4.09 .43% .28 $.31
NV 570 $129.98 12.54% 2.79 $16.30 .52% .25 $.68
NY 1,332 $1,949.98 4.62% 1.08 $90.17 1.88% .37 $36.63
OH 1,205 $703.57 20.51% 2.43 $144.30 .84% .21 $5.89
OK 432 $103.43 3.58% 1.51 $3.71 .29% .23 $.30
OR 792 $356.57 11.29% 2.37 $40.27 .98% .39 $3.50
PA 1,200 $1,598.54 3.95% .99 $63.20 .84% .35 $13.43
PR 573 $209.55 9.48% 2.41 $19.88 1.28% .55 $2.68
RI 605 $176.31 4.07% 1.43 $7.18 .73% .38 $1.28
SC 728 $193.77 8.65% 2.00 $16.75 .41% .35 $.80
SD 480 $15.57 8.04% 2.40 $1.25 .47% .39 $.07
TN 960 $316.81 3.08% 1.10 $9.77 .47% .27 $1.48
TX 551 $895.48 7.83% 2.31 $70.08 .89% .58 $7.96
UT 506 $67.01 10.64% 2.74 $7.13 .78% .53 $.52
VA 694 $185.49 15.32% 2.80 $28.41 .53% .30 $.99
VT 435 $46.96 7.19% 2.41 $3.38 .57% .28 $.27
WA 924 $741.36 6.62% 1.68 $49.07 .46% .24 $3.45
WI 960 $481.48 8.60% 1.92 $41.39 1.01% .45 $4.84
WV 512 $142.41 3.20% 1.60 $4.56 .54% .35 $.77
WY 480 $30.20 11.06% 3.20 $3.34 .41% .27 $.12
US 39,057 $20,670.71 8.04% .33 $1,661.67 .96% .08 $197.92

* In Millions of dollars

Prepared by: U.S. Dept. of Labor Unemployment Insurance Service Division of Performance Review

Find it! in DOL
Compliance Assistance

Resources
Subscribe to Email Updates

About UI Laws Data and Statistics Budget

Advisories

About OWS


Created: March 29, 2004

Updated: April 2, 2004